The City Mayors Code of Ethics serves as a benchmark to honest and open local government
Recommended sources for additional reading
Ester R. Fuchs, Mayors and Money Fiscal Policy in New York and Chicago (University of Chicago, 1992)
Management Policies in Local Government Finance, International City/County Management Association.
Alternative Revenue Sources and Structures for Baltimore City
PILOTS give Local Government Revenues a Lift
Licensing Power and Local Sources of Municipal Revenue
Local Government Innovation Issues and Trends in Privatization and Managed Competition, Edited by Robin A. Johnson and Norman Walzer (Quorum Books 2000)
About us | Quiénes somos |
A propos de nous | Über uns |
Code of Ethics
Local government finance - USA
Fiscal control boards in the US
US bankrupt cities
US cities seek extra revenue
US cities finances
Community Land Trusts
Stimulus package for US cities
NYC prepares for future
LA in real estate crisis
Cell phone tax
US subprime mortgage crisis
NC local government finance
US cities' legal powers
Politically neglected US cities
US community grant eliminated
Local government mergers
Large US cities hardest hit by recession
Metro job growth in the US
Largest US cities
US local government
Directory of US cities
Poverty in US cities
City Mayors reports news from towns and cities around the world. Worldwide | Elections | North America | Latin America | Europe | Asia | Africa | Events |
Mayors from The Americas, Europe. Asia, Australia and Africa are competing for the annual World Mayor Award. More
City Mayors ranks the world’s largest as well as richest cities and urban areas. It also ranks the cities in individual countries, and provides a list of the capital cities of some 200 sovereign countries. More
City Mayors reports political events, analyses the issues and depicts the main players. More
City Mayors describes and explains the structures and workings of local government in Europe, The Americas, Asia, Australia and Africa. More
City Mayors profiles city leaders from around the world and questions them about their achievements, policies and aims. More
City Mayors deals with economic and investment issues affecting towns and cities. More
City Mayors reports on how business developments impact on cities and examines cooperation between cities and the private sector. More
City Mayors describes and explains financial issues affecting local government. More
City Mayors lists and features urban events, conferences and conventions aimed at urban decision makers and those with an interst in cities worldwide. More
City Mayors reports urban environmental developments and examines the challenges faced by cities worldwide. More
City Mayors reports on and discusses urban development issues in developed and developing countries. More
City Mayors reports on developments in urban society and behaviour and reviews relevant research. More
City Mayors deals with urban transport issues in developed and developing countries and features the world’s greatest metro systems. More
City Mayors examines education issues and policies affecting children and adults in urban areas. More
City Mayors investigates health issues affecting urban areas with an emphasis on health in cities in developing countries. More
City Mayors examines the importance of urban tourism to city economies. More
City Mayors examines the contributions history and culture make to urban society and environment. More
City Mayors describes the history, architecture and politics of the greatest city halls in the world. More
City Mayors invites readers to write short stories about people in cities around the world. More
City Mayors questions those who govern the world’s cities and talks to men and women who contribute to urban society and environment. More
City Mayors profiles national and international organisations representing cities as well as those dealing with urban issues. More
City Mayors reports on major national and international sporting events and their impact on cities. More
City Mayors lists cities and city organisations, profiles individual mayors and provides information on hundreds of urban events. More
US cities under increasing
financial strain, says study
By Mayraj Fahim, Local government adviser
4 January 2006: A study by the US Brookings institution found that increased the costs of providing homeland security, education as well as health care and pension provisions for employees are putting US cities under an increasing financial strain. The study also reveals that in order to make up for lost federal aid, cities are relying more on state aid. They also enhance revenues by dipping into reserves as well as increasing user charges and fees.
A number of other articles on this website already deal with the challenging environment local governments in the US have faced over the past few decades. This topical subject matter is currently also discussed by a several organizations including the Brookings Institution.
In 2005, the Brookings Institution released a discussion paper by Bruce A Watlin, an associate professor of political science at Northeastern University and a former senior research analyst with the U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental relations. The paper was entitled: ‘Budgeting for Basics: The Changing Landscape of City Finances’.
This is a study of the evolution in city finances of 162 cities since 1977, the year preceding California’s paradigm-changing Proposition 13 tax cut citizen’s initiative that had nationwide ramifications, to 2000. The paper further looks at survey data from 54 cities collected in 2004 on the subject of their handling of the 2001 recession.
Highlighted points in the revenue and expenditure trends in the study include the following:
• Declining federal aid with state funding moving to fill the gap to varying degrees.
• Most growth in state aid has been for education (from kindergarten to the pre-college Twelfth Grade).
• Reliance of cities on property tax has declined (with citizen pressures against it fuelled by the 1978 California Proposition) from 27.1% in 1977 to 21.4% in 2000. Income taxes (where permitted), and sales taxes (where permitted) picked up the slack along with the fastest growing source of city revenues: user charges and fees (rising from 11.2% in 1977 to 17.9% in 2000).
• Spending grew relatively slower in cities as compared with state and local governments in general
• Interest payment on debt has grown the most, although it declined during the 1990s through refinancing at lower interest rates and loss in federal aid programs that subsidized capital spending.
Diversity in city expenditure burdens and choices has led to trends that vary by city type. The study divided 162 cities into categories to refine its analysis of fiscal trends. The defining categories were: education cities; non-education cities; property tax-only cities; income tax cities; sales tax cities; utility tax cities and California cities (which constituted a significant proportion of the cities studied, also subject to voter initiated taxing and spending requirements in the state that used popular democracy mechanisms the most of any state in the United States).
In the recent trend survey from the portion of the 54 cities in the study, the following was illustrated:
• Fiscal conditions worsened in 2004, particularly in the case of education and income tax cities with continued strain from public safety costs including that of homeland security, employee benefit (particularly health care and pension), and education costs.
• City budget challenges are structural more than cyclical on both the spending and revenue side.
• In a climate of receding federal aid, decline in state aid due to recession placed additional pressures on the cities.
• To enhance revenues, cities dipped into reserves and raised user charges and fees
In general, cities were hesitant to reduce expenditures and raise revenues through substantive means, and instead chose the incremental route to buy time. Moreover, looking for the least political solution led cities towards choices such as hiring freezes and targeted cuts in spending such as postponing capital expenditures, along with across the board cuts in general spending categories for their less perceptible citizen impact. Employee firing also took place, but to a lesser degree than the more popular choices made during the recession.
The study also cites the innovative paths taken by Austin (Texas), Jacksonville (Florida), Boston (Massachusetts), Oakland (California), Long beach (California), and Syracuse (New York).
The study further noted that public-private partnerships were not used every extensively - but cited some notable examples from the Twin Cities of Minnesota (Minneapolis and St Paul), and Las Vegas (Nevada).
Structural constraints in an era of rising costs and receding federal aid and unreliable state aid has placed US cities, as illustrated by the Brookings discussion paper, in a challenging environment that shows no sign of flexibility and without any changing of the paradigm.
Interested readers can examine the full report by visiting the Brookings Institution’s link to the article: http://www.brookings.edu/metro/pubs/20050823_BudgetingBasics.pdf
• Poverty is a crime against humanity
• Support mayors who fight poverty
• Nominate the best for the 2020 World Mayor Prize