Extreme weather conditions could influence voters' behaviour in several US states



FRONT PAGE
SiteSearch
About us
Mayor Monitor
Directories
Events
Debate


US 2012 mayoral elections
US 2011 mayoral elections
US elections 2010: Results
US elections 2009: Results
US elections 08: Factors
US elections 08: Urban issues
US presidential candidates 08
US mayors
Power relations in US cities
Mayors in the White House
Politically neglected US cities
Mayors for US presicency
US politcs and consumerism


City Mayors reports news from towns and cities around the world. Worldwide | Elections | North America | Latin America | Europe | Asia | Africa | Events |


Mayors from The Americas, Europe. Asia, Australia and Africa are competing for the annual World Mayor Award. More


City Mayors ranks the world’s largest as well as richest cities and urban areas. It also ranks the cities in individual countries, and provides a list of the capital cities of some 200 sovereign countries. More


City Mayors reports political events, analyses the issues and depicts the main players. More


City Mayors describes and explains the structures and workings of local government in Europe, The Americas, Asia, Australia and Africa. More


City Mayors profiles city leaders from around the world and questions them about their achievements, policies and aims. More


City Mayors deals with economic and investment issues affecting towns and cities. More


City Mayors reports on how business developments impact on cities and examines cooperation between cities and the private sector. More


City Mayors describes and explains financial issues affecting local government. More


City Mayors lists and features urban events, conferences and conventions aimed at urban decision makers and those with an interst in cities worldwide. More


City Mayors reports urban environmental developments and examines the challenges faced by cities worldwide. More


City Mayors reports on and discusses urban development issues in developed and developing countries. More


City Mayors reports on developments in urban society and behaviour and reviews relevant research. More


City Mayors deals with urban transport issues in developed and developing countries and features the world’s greatest metro systems. More


City Mayors examines education issues and policies affecting children and adults in urban areas. More


City Mayors investigates health issues affecting urban areas with an emphasis on health in cities in developing countries. More


City Mayors examines the importance of urban tourism to city economies. More


City Mayors examines the contributions history and culture make to urban society and environment. More


City Mayors describes the history, architecture and politics of the greatest city halls in the world. More


City Mayors invites readers to write short stories about people in cities around the world. More


City Mayors questions those who govern the world’s cities and talks to men and women who contribute to urban society and environment. More


City Mayors profiles national and international organisations representing cities as well as those dealing with urban issues. More


City Mayors reports on major national and international sporting events and their impact on cities. More


City Mayors lists cities and city organisations, profiles individual mayors and provides information on hundreds of urban events. More

Race and weather may
influence US elections

By Tony Favro, US Correspondent

22 October 2008: Earlier this year, the US Conference of Mayors released a 10-point plan to revitalize American cities. The mayors pressed the presidential candidates to adopt their plan as official campaign policy and take a position in support of cities. The mayors assumed that voters pay attention to a candidate's policies and positions. However, studies of American voter behavior suggest that such factors as the color of a candidate's clothes or the weather outside may play at least as important a role as a candidate’s policies in determining the outcome of a presidential election.

Do political positions make the difference?
It isn't a coincidence that both Barack Obama and John McCain wore dark blue suits in all their debates or that Sarah Palin frequently wears red in public. "Blue is a positive color, signifying authority and control. But it is a negative color for women. Red is a warm, sentimental color for women." This advice is from the book Winning Elections: Political Campaign Management, Strategy and Tactics by Robert Faucheux. The book is a compilation of articles from "Campaigns & Elections,” a magazine for professionals who manage political campaigns.

The common thread in all the articles in the book is: Don't assume that a candidate's positions are going to make the difference in a close election. By most estimates, according to the research presented in the book, fewer than half of American voters fully understand the issues and decide for whom to vote based on a candidate’s personal traits or other factors.

Political scientist Philip Converse writes that only 10 per cent of the American public has a reasonable grasp of "what goes with what;" in other words, how a set of beliefs add up to a coherent political philosophy. According to Converse, about 25 per cent of Americans have no coherent political views. They don't understand, for example, how a belief that taxes must be lower should logically rule out a belief that government must provide more services.

Converse analyzed American public opinion surveys over a number of years and found random, inconsistent answers to the same questions. He concluded that "very substantial portions of the public" hold opinions that are essentially meaningless. They are derived from no underlying set of principles.

Other studies reach the same conclusion. Rephrasing survey questions, for example, demonstrates that many people don't understand the question they just answered. For example, according to one study, 25 percent of Americans believe that too little is being spent on welfare, and 65 percent believe that too little is being spent on assistance for the poor.

So what exactly do Americans consider when they enter the voting booth? The weather is one option. Political scientists Christopher Aachen and Larry Bartels found that "2.8 million people voted against Al Gore in 2000 because their states were too dry or too wet" as a result of that year's climate patterns. Aachen and Bartels estimate that this cost Gore the majority of votes in eight states, a victory in any one of which would have won him the presidency over George Bush.

Bartels also points out that when people do focus on specific policies they are often unable to distinguish their own best interests. For example, when people were asked whether they favored George Bush's proposal to eliminate the estate tax, two-thirds said yes, even though 98 per cent of Americans do not leave estates large enough to trigger the tax. Repeal of the estate tax was supported by two-thirds of the people who believe that the income gap between the richest and poorest Americans is increasing, and that this is a bad thing for the country. It was also supported by two-thirds of those who say the rich should pay more in taxes.

In other words, most Americans don't make a connection between national tax policy, the country's economic condition, and their self-interest. Instead, they vote repeatedly to transfer more wealth to fewer people.

Rationality and intuition
Are American voters so trivialized in their thinking that they can no longer responsibly elect a President? Or do the cues they respond to, in fact, form an adequate base for rational decision making?

Political scientist Samuel Potkin argues in his book The Reasoning Voter that American voters don't have the time or inclination to assess candidates in depth, so they rely on the advice of "experts" -- television commentators, political activists, trusted friends, newspaper editorials, Internet blogs -- combined with their own intuition to make a judgment on candidates. Usually, people feel satisfied with decisions they reach in this way, Popkin argues, because this is how they arrive at most of the big decisions in their lives. When people decide to purchase a house, for example, most rely on the experiences of two or three friends who have recently bought a house, some comparison shopping, and the pitch of the real estate sales person. Most people are happy with their purchase, and they conclude the transaction in a relatively short period of time. Rarely, is the time involved in shopping for a new home anywhere near the length of a presidential campaign.

Popkin argues that some voters will get it wrong, choosing the liberal candidate when they really preferred the conservative; but their error will be cancelled out by voters who mistakenly choose the conservative.

The Race Factor
The 2008 presidential election is complicated by the fact that, for the first time in American history, one candidate is Black. Numerous polls show that 70 per cent of Americans disapprove of Republican President George Bush, suggesting that the Democratic candidate, Barack Obama, should have an advantage over his Republican counterpart, John McClain. However, an Associated Press-Yahoo poll conducted in August and September found that 40 per cent of white Americans hold a negative view of Black people.

Many political observers recall the "Bradley Effect" or the "Wilder Effect."

The references are to Tom Bradley, the African-American mayor of Los Angeles who lost the 1982 California governor's race to a white opponent despite a significant lead in the polls. A similar event took place in 1989 when Douglas Wilder barely defeated a white opponent for the governorship of Virginia after polls suggested he was comfortably ahead. In both cases, large numbers of whites refused to vote for the Black candidate simply because he was Black.

Other observers, such as writer Daniel Okrent, believe that increased participation among black voters will offset the Bradley Effect, should it occur.

The Obama Effect
Only two accurate predictions can perhaps be made about the upcoming US presidential elections. The first is that the candidates' specific policies and positions will be a secondary factor for a large number of voters. Many voters will base their decisions on intuition, perceptions, and prejudices. This has been true of all US presidential elections since at least World War II, when political polling and statistical analysis of election results became routine, and is not likely to change in 2008.

The second prediction that we can make with any accuracy is that, if Barack Obama wins, the election will foster a new industry of books, dissertations, articles, and other political analysis and commentary about the "Obama Effect." 
This article contains reporting from Louis Menand’s “The Unpolitical Animal.”


A poll says that 40 per cent of white voters in the US hold a negative view of black people (Photo: Democrat presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama)


Also by Tony Favro
US presidential candidates largely ignore urban issues
S cities are struggling with unemployment, housing, underperforming schools, aging infrastructure, and poverty, while devoting more resources than ever to energy costs and homeland security. Mayors of the nation’s cities say that such concerns have been largely ignored in the presidential campaigns. The US Conference of Mayors has urged the presidential candidates to adopt their 10-point plan Strong Cities for a Strong America ’08. It asks candidates to commit to strengthening the economies of metropolitan areas.

“We must invest wisely in our youth, our workforce, and our infrastructure in ways that spur creativity and competitiveness,” says Douglas Palmer, the mayor of Trenton, New Jersey and president of the US Conference of Mayors which represents nearly 1,200 US cities with populations of more than 30,000. “Our national leaders – and those who seek to lead – must work directly with mayors on the 10 priorities identified by the members of the US Conference of Mayors.” More