City Mayors examines the impact on cities of major international sporting events


FRONT PAGE
SiteSearch
About us


2012 Olympics: East London
London Olympics: Legacy
Impact of 2012 Olympics
How London won the 2012 Olympics
2012 Olympics: The popular vote


City Mayors reports news from towns and cities around the world. Worldwide | Elections | North America | Latin America | Europe | Asia | Africa | Events |


Mayors from The Americas, Europe. Asia, Australia and Africa are competing for the annual World Mayor Award. More


City Mayors ranks the world’s largest as well as richest cities and urban areas. It also ranks the cities in individual countries, and provides a list of the capital cities of some 200 sovereign countries. More


City Mayors reports political events, analyses the issues and depicts the main players. More


City Mayors describes and explains the structures and workings of local government in Europe, The Americas, Asia, Australia and Africa. More


City Mayors profiles city leaders from around the world and questions them about their achievements, policies and aims. More


City Mayors deals with economic and investment issues affecting towns and cities. More


City Mayors reports on how business developments impact on cities and examines cooperation between cities and the private sector. More


City Mayors describes and explains financial issues affecting local government. More


City Mayors lists and features urban events, conferences and conventions aimed at urban decision makers and those with an interst in cities worldwide. More


City Mayors reports urban environmental developments and examines the challenges faced by cities worldwide. More


City Mayors reports on and discusses urban development issues in developed and developing countries. More


City Mayors reports on developments in urban society and behaviour and reviews relevant research. More


City Mayors deals with urban transport issues in developed and developing countries and features the world’s greatest metro systems. More


City Mayors examines education issues and policies affecting children and adults in urban areas. More


City Mayors investigates health issues affecting urban areas with an emphasis on health in cities in developing countries. More


City Mayors examines the importance of urban tourism to city economies. More


City Mayors examines the contributions history and culture make to urban society and environment. More


City Mayors describes the history, architecture and politics of the greatest city halls in the world. More


City Mayors invites readers to write short stories about people in cities around the world. More


City Mayors questions those who govern the world’s cities and talks to men and women who contribute to urban society and environment. More


City Mayors profiles national and international organisations representing cities as well as those dealing with urban issues. More


City Mayors reports on major national and international sporting events and their impact on cities. More


City Mayors lists cities and city organisations, profiles individual mayors and provides information on hundreds of urban events. More

This is an archived article published in May 2004. Updated article
First IOC report makes Paris and Madrid
favourites for the 2012 Summer Olympics

By James Monaghan, Feature Editor

In its first technical report on the 2012 Summer Olympics, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) awarded Paris and Madrid the overall highest marks. Madrid rated highest in five of eleven categories, while Paris rated highest on security, accommodation and the Olympic Village. London, while also receiving top marks for security, was criticised for its ‘obsolete’ rail transport system. New York City scored highly in most technical aspects but the IOC detected a lack of local support for the Games.

The Games of the XXX Olympiad will be celebrated in 2012. Five cities from the nine Applicant Cities to host them have been accepted as Candidate Cities, it was announced by the International Olympic Committee in Lausanne, Switzerland on 18th May, 2004. These were Paris, Madrid, London, New York and Moscow. The losers were Havana, Leipzig, Rio de Janeiro and Istanbul, the last for the fourth consecutive time.

The decision rested on a technical report based on ten individual criteria - Government and public support, general infrastructure, sports venues, Olympic Village, environmental conditions and impact, accommodation, transport, security, experience and finance - plus the overall project and legacy.

Paris and Madrid were neck-and-neck with an average of 8.5 each out of a possible 11. London got 7, New York 6.5 and Moscow scraped in with 6 – the minimum rating to progress to the candidate phase. Leipzig missed out with 5.5 followed by Rio (5), Istanbul (4) and Havana (3). The Commission had ?great confidence? that Paris, Madrid, London and New York had the capacity to host the games. It was less sure of Moscow and though the other four cities currently unable to handle the games.

Paris and London rated highest on security. Paris rated highest on the overall project and legacy, accommodation and the Olympic Village. It suffered in its plans for transporting athletes between venues and for slow links to the airport.

Madrid rated highest in five of the eleven categories. These included the city centre transport system, an Olympic Village to be sited only a mile from the main stadium, and its positive environmental impact.

London was criticised for its “obsolete” rail transport and congested arterial roads, which led to questions on the estimated travel times and speeds. It also had to improve public support and experience of handling international sporting events other than Wimbledon. London 2012 blamed the quality of its documentation on government delays and seemed confident in being able to address the criticisms. As well as security, London scored highly on accommodation and the proposed Olympic Park at Stratford, which would host 16 sports, as well as the proposed use of Lord’s, Wimbledon, Greenwich and Hyde Park.

New York scored highly in many areas, including accommodation and sports infrastructure, but lost out for lack of support from the public, which worried about overcrowding and traffic problems.

Moscow, in spite of its experience hosting international sporting events, was criticised for security problems and its severe air and water pollution.

Since the announcement, there have been several developments. Rio’s surprise failure to qualify for the next stage means that no South American country has hosted the Olympics in spite of IOC aims to award the Games to alternate continents. London’s Mayor, Ken Livingstone, predicts that many South American votes will go now to Madrid.

In London, soon after the announcement of its success in the first stage of the bidding process, the American-born head of the 2012 team, Barbara Cassani, stepped aside. Although an acknowledged winner at getting new projects off the ground – she was co-founder of the budget airline, Go!, she felt that the next stage, hanging around in exclusive hotels lobbying the elderly gentlemen who cast the decisive votes, should be passed on to someone else more appropriate. She will remain behind the scenes helping to compile the technical details of the ‘bid book, which will form the basis of London’s detailed submission to the IOC in November.

Her successor has more relevant form for the lobbying process. He is Sebastian Coe, Baron Coe of Ranmore, double Olympic Gold Medallist and multiple world record holder. As a British Member of Parliament he was an aide to the former leader of the Conservative Party, William Hague. He became a Lord after he lost his parliamentary seat in the 2001 election. It is said that he is a close friend of the former president of the IOC for 21 years, Juan Antonio Samaranch. He will concentrate in the coming year on jetting to various meetings to persuade what one British newspaper called “the curious mixture of politicians, businessmen, minor royalty and potentates that make up the IOC membership” of the merits of the London bid to host the 2012 Olympics.

The results for World Mayor 2010 were announced on 7 December 2010


Introducing
World Mayor

The City Mayors Foundation, the international think tank on urban affairs, organises the World Mayor Project and awards the World Mayor Prize. The Prize, which has been given since 2004, honours mayors with the vision, passion and skills to make their cities incredible places to live in, work in and visit. The World Mayor Project aims to show what outstanding mayors can achieve and raise their profiles nationally and internationally. Mayors wishing to be considered for the Prize are asked to sign up to the City Mayors Code of Ethics.

The organisers of the World Mayor Project are looking for city leaders who excel in qualities like: leadership and vision, management abilities and integrity, social and economic awareness, ability to provide security and to protect the environment as well as the will and ability to foster good relations between communities from different cultural, racial and social backgrounds. Winners receive the World Mayor Prize, while the first and second runners-up receive the World Mayor Commendation.

Winners and runners-up
2004 to 2010:

In 2004: Winner: Edi Rama (Tirana); Runner-up: Andrés Manuel López Obrador (Mexico City}; In third place - Walter Veltroni (Rome)
In 2005: Winner – Dora Bakoyannis (Athens); Runner-up - Hazel McCallion (Mississauga); In third place - Alvaro Arzú (Guatemala City)
In 2006: Winner – John So (Melbourne); Runner up – Job Cohen (Amsterdam); In third place - Stephen Reed (Harrisburg)
In 2008: Winner – Helen Zille (Cape Town); Runner up - Elmar Ledergerber (Zurich); In third place - Leopoldo López (Chacao)
In 2010: Winner - Marcelo Ebrard (Mexico City); First runner-up - Mick Cornett (Oklahoma City); Second runner-up - Domenico Lucano (Riace) More