Ahmedabad's bus stations feature off-board fare collection and level access to buses



FRONT PAGE
Site Search
About us
Directories


Barcelona Metro
Berlin U-Bahn
Guangzhou Metro
Guatemala City TransMetro
London Transport
London Underground
Madrid Metro
Mexico City Metrobus
New York City Subway
Paris Métro
Sao Paulo Metro
Singapore Metro
Tokyo Metro

Bus Rapid Transport Latin America
Bus Rapid Transport India
Trams in Europe


Worldwide | Elections | North America | Latin America | Europe | Asia | Africa |

























Ahmedabad is the first city in India
to adopt a Bus Rapid Transit system

By Madhav Pai and Abhijit Lokre*

17 March 2010: In October 2009, Ahmedabad - with a population of 4.5 million the largest city in the state of Gujarat - inaugurated the first 12 kilometres of its public transport program Janmarg. It is India's first true Bus Rapid Transit System (BRT).

Janmarg incorporates several sophisticated features of a high-level BRT system, including:
• Median busways with strong longitudinal segregation and good pavement structure
• Changes in road geometry to accommodate new traffic patterns, including split flyovers, as well as new pedestrian and bicycle facilities
• Real bus stations, located in the median, with off-board automatic fare collection and level access to the buses
• Renewed vehicle fleets with special design, including wide doors on both sides; and;
• Frequent service to improve passenger convenience


When fully realised, the system is expected to achieve high user acceptance, reduce total travel time for system users and provide reliable and comfortable services, with very low costs compared to rail alternatives with similar performance. The system also includes electronic fare collection, centralised control and user information systems. All these elements are classified as high-end, making Janmarg the first full BRT system in India.

Continuous improvement
When we first reviewed it, the system was still in an early-operational state. The system was being operated through paper tickets issued at the gate. The usage was high. The system was carrying 20,000 passengers per day in 18 buses. Another 14 were on its way. There were still elements to improve, which include completing details in the road and at the stations. The bicycles lanes need to be cleaned of the debris and the footpaths still needed finishing touches. Pedestrian crossings at the far side of the stations did not have adequate signals, and the signalling system was not integrated yet.

By February 2010, signalling systems had been integrated, both at junctions and behind them. Technology components - smart cards and passenger information systems - are in place. The corridor has been extended and is now 24.5 km long. The ridership has increased to 35,000 passengers per day on weekdays and 40,000 passengers per day on weekends.

A need for permanent maintenance is still evident. For instance, several bollards to control motor vehicles in pedestrian crossings were damaged. Also, fare collection, central control and dispatch, and variable message signs at stations, were not yet operational. However, most of the missing elements were in the process of being completed.

When fully realised, the system is expected to achieve high user acceptance, reduce total travel time for system users, and provide reliable and comfortable services, with very low costs compared to rail alternatives with similar performance. It also brings the opportunity to reduce harmful local and global emissions, increase the safety and security of the corridor, and improve opportunities for orderly urban development.

To realise all these benefits, the implementation needs to be carried out as planned. It is also necessary to set up a quality improvement program, which measures system performance and provides input to continuous improvement. Given the careful planning and implementation, it is expected that the system will be a great success, and a great example for other applications in India and beyond.

Elements of success
I P Gautam, the municipal commissioner of the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation said Janmarg focused on moving people, not traffic. It is also important to ensure adequate coordination among stakeholders and good technical planning and careful implementation, achieved with the support from the Centre for Environmental Planning and Technology (CEPT) and the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP).

The systems approach, which combines infrastructure, vehicles, operations, technologies and user education, creates a seamless implementation process. Quality assurance through performance monitoring will bring permanent service improvements and is the next step after completing the infrastructure details. As a result of the systematic and complete consideration of all the dimensions of a full BRT, Janmarg is in the process of becoming "a high quality public transport system, oriented to the user that offers fast, comfortable and low cost urban mobility," notes the BRT Planning Guide, ITDP/GTZ, 2007.

Initial planning for the BRTS started in Ahmedabad in 2005. It has taken four years to inaugurate the first 12kms. There were a lot of hurdles to overcome during design and planning. Now that they have been scaled and there is a general acceptance to the concept things have begun to move faster. If the rest of the work moves as per schedule, the city would have completed 58 kms as part of phase I by end of 2010, and 88 kms by 2013.

Janmarg - phase I and II
And what will these 88kms of BRT cost? The road infrastructure costs 85 million rupees (US$1.87m) per km. There is a planned 4.5 km elevated bus-only section around the central railway station, which will cost 290m rupees per km. The total project cost is 4 billion rupees ($88 million). Herein lies a big lesson for all Indian cities. With increasing motorisation, traffic congestion is increasing. It is important to understand there is no "solution" to traffic jams. What you can solve is the mobility problems faced by the people. And the only way to do it is to build large mass transport systems in a short period of time. Only BRT provides that option, not Metro.

And this is the real lesson from Janmarg - investments in bus-based solutions are far cheaper and more quickly turned into value than the money spent on Metros. Ahmedabad leads the way in showing this off, even as Mumbai and Bangalore have been struggling over 10 years to build the first few kilometres on new mass rapid transport.

The international public transport community defines bus rapid transit (BRT) as "a flexible, rubber-tired form of rapid transit that combines stations, vehicles, services, running ways and [intelligent transportation systems] elements into an integrated system with strong identity" (TCRP Report 90, "Bus Rapid Transit - Volume 2: Implementation Guidelines," 2003). Janmarg, Ahmedabad's BRT system meets most of the highest standards applied internationally. It is already a 'best practice' of BRT in South Asia and is in sharp contrast to the bus corridors in operation in Delhi and Pune.

*Madhav Pai is Technical Director, India, at EMBARQ at the World Resources Institute Center for sustainable transport. Abhijit Lokre is assistant professor at the Center for Environmental Planning and Technology, Ahmedabad. The above article was first published by India Together

Further reading: www.indiatogether.org/2006/may/eco-brts.htm




Ahmedabad's BRT system runs specially designed buses with wide doors on both sides


On other pages
Latin American cities: pioneers of Bus Rapid Transit systems
Over the past fifteen years, cities throughout Latin America have achieved a modest, yet significant, revolution in urban design through the adoption and refinement of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) systems. Promising the benefits of developed world transit systems at developing world prices, BRT has quickly become a popular policy initiative among national and municipal level Latin American policymakers charged with reducing the crippling congestion, choking pollution, and alarming accident rates characteristic of the largely unregulated bus transit systems in most cities throughout the region.

Pioneered in the mid-sized Brazilian city of Curitiba in the 1970s, Bus Rapid Transit increased bus speeds and improved road safety by placing high-capacity buses within committed bus lanes which channel buses to a series of fixed stations, similar to light-rail or metro systems. Inspired by the success of Curitiba’s system, cities such as Mexico City, Bogotá and Quito have more recently made BRT the linchpin of their transit network, to considerable acclaim from the riding public and international observers alike. More